Fighting Injustice Together

ADVOCATE is UK based groups of whistleblowers, victims of state corruption, and  and private prosecutors, who wish to share their knowledge and experiences, with others, free of charge, to become Free Human Rights Advocates, who can use precedents in key cases, to restore the Criminal Justice Systems of the world.

Through free training videos, we aim to assist each other with practical knowledge and skills to fight against ongoing state-led corruption, fraudulent trading and injustices in the UK, Commonwealth, and internationally, in contempt of those precedents.

(1) https://private-prosecutions.com/charging-and-commencing-proceedings/ 

(2) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1091922/criminal-procedure-amendment-no-2_-rules-2022-guide.pdf

(3) https://www.youtube.com/@vpc1111

Precedents in Criminal Appeals Court:-

1. [2020] EWCA Crim 369

FOR FREE HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATES + PRIVATE PROSECUTORS 

https://youtu.be/i_Niaguk84Y  FREE TRAINING VIDEO

28 Feb 2020: How "Fraudulent Trading" or "Money Laundering", "Concealing the proceeds of Crime" and "conspiracy to conceal proceeds of crime" (Piracy or white collar crimes) are a criminal offence with precedents of 49 years jail sentences in Criminal Appeals Court Jurisdiction [2020] EWCA Crim 369:-

Lloyds Banking Group's HBOS Reading APPEAL JUDGMENT with 49 YEARS JAIL PRECEDENTS FOR WHITE COLLAR CRIMES OF "FRAUDULENT TRADING", Paragraph 1.

 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2020/369.html 

OR DOWNLOAD BELOW:-


 Lloyds Bankers (HBOS) jailed for 49 years - 

Paragraph 1 

LORD JUSTICE IRWIN: On 30 January 2017 at the Southwark Crown Court, following a trial before His Honour Judge Beddoe and a jury, the applicants, C and B, and the appellant, M, were convicted of the offences we shall recite in a moment. On 2 February 2017 they were sentenced as follows. C: for count 4, fraudulent trading, contrary to section 458 of the Companies Act 1985, three-and-a-half years' imprisonment and on count 6, conspiracy to conceal criminal property, contrary to section 1 of the Criminal Law Act 1977, three-and-a-half years' imprisonment concurrent. B: count 1, conspiracy to corrupt, 6 years' imprisonment; counts 3, 4 and 5, counts of fraudulent trading contrary to section 458, in each case 4 years' imprisonment consecutive to the sentence on count 1 but concurrent with each other. Finally, on count 6, the concealing of criminal property, 6 years' imprisonment again concurrent, and therefore a total of 10 years' imprisonment. Finally M: on count 1, conspiracy to corrupt, 7 years' imprisonment; on counts 2 and 3, fraudulent trading, in each case contrary to section 458, 4 years' imprisonment on each consecutive; on count 4, a fraudulent trading count, 4 years' imprisonment concurrent; on count 5, 4 years' imprisonment concurrent and on count 6, 7 years' imprisonment concurrent, and therefore a total of 15 years' imprisonment. Ancillary orders were made.

Fraudulent trading is proved with evidence of fraudulent documents, without official seals of the court (not computer generated) without wet ink signature of the judge (or without name provided), not produced in the court, the file not retained in the court, thereby denying the statutory rights of two appeals

2. Leighton V Bristow & Sutor

Wayne Leighton proved that all Liability Orders issued in bulk or without a hearing and rights of appeal were null and void (Fraudulent Trading) - because the documents were drafted and generated by the Local Government, within their buildings, not by the Magistrates in the Magistrates Couts -  the High Court judge ought to have referred the case to the Criminal Appeals Court for a review of the insufficient deterrents in the ongoing fraudulent trading of public offices and public officers.  

This means that all documentation produced without a hearing taking place and without notice of a hearing denied the right of appeal deeming them unenforceable.  Under the Criminal Law Act 1967 section 4, silence is a crime, equal in severity to the crime witnessed, as an aider and abetter, accomplice, conspirator!

Leighton Draft Appeal to Supreme Court:- 

https://buymeacoffee.com/lynnedmnobl/a-leap-frog-application-heard-supreme-court  

or click below to download:-

26 June 2024 Surrey Police fail to make arrests

26 Jun 2024: Lloyds Locksmith rams car into peacekeeper + Bailiff rams his car into Banaman - Surrey Police say it's a "Civil" matter https://youtu.be/wE7Mims_ENY 

Met Police hide in corner with body cams switched off (whilst Sergeant Beadle is on "a phone call" in a marked police car, around the corner, as Bailiffs distract supporters whilst battering ram thugs smash thru window and come flying back out within seconds, landing on the bike shed at The Lodge London SE16 2UB https://youtu.be/hv3pLQjrMO8 Go to 4mins 19 sec

THE LODGE SURREY QUAYS LONDON UK - METROPOLITAN POLICE OFFICERS HIDE, WITH BODYCAMS SWITCHED OFF, TO DENY WITNESSING CRIMES BY THUGS DRESSED AS BAILIFFS, WITH FRAUDULENT INSTRUMENTS, PRINTED AT HOME, NOT ISSUED BY ANY JUDGE OR COURT

Law Commission Report on Confiscations 2022, was aimed at early compensation for victims, yet the case of Danny Beach, theft of Padd Farm by Folkestone Magistrates Court, which is cited on page 35, is still without remedy, DOWNLOAD LINK BELOW:- 

Free Book on "Proceeds of Crime" 6th Edition also cites the case of Danny Beach, theft of Padd Farm by Folkestone Magistrates Court, DOWNLOAD LINK BELOW:-

Fighting State Corruption Together

Create your website for free! This website was made with Webnode. Create your own for free today! Get started